Trump Attorney Expects Justices to Maintain Election Ballot Presence
Donald Trump's lawyer anticipates Supreme Court intervention to ensure Trump's position on key state ballots.
Sam Morgan
- 2024-01-07
- Updated 07:11 AM ET
(NewsNibs) - In light of the former President Donald Trump being stricken from electoral ballots in Colorado and Maine, attorney Alina Habba has suggested that the Supreme Court may intervene on his behalf. This potential judicial action would be in response to Trump's removal under the 14th Amendment, due to allegations of participating in an insurrection, tying back to the January 6 Capitol riot. Habba has expressed a particular confidence in the high court, endorsing its competence in addressing an appeal led by the National Republican Senatorial Committee aiming to keep Trump on the ballot in Colorado.
Remarks on Judicial Independence
Habba underscored the involvement of Justice Brett Kavanaugh, one of three justices appointed by Trump who have contributed to the Court's conservative tilt. She hinted at an expectation that Kavanaugh would "step up" in light of the circumstances. This sentiment arrives amidst broader discussions on the Supreme Court's decisions, notably its recent action to rescind the federal right to abortion, a landmark movement celebrated by pro-life advocates.
The commentary by Trump's legal representative sparked criticism from Joyce Vance, a former U.S. Attorney, who considered Habba's statements "appalling", asserting during an interview that federal judges are bound to rule based on law and facts, irrespective of the president who appointed them. Vance pointed to a worrying trend by Trump and his cohort to sow doubts about the legitimacy of American democratic institutions, including the integrity of the Supreme Court.
Ongoing Coverage and Reflections
As the story unfolds, Newsweek had reached out to Alina Habba for additional comment, maintaining their journalistic commitment to challenging norms and fostering dialogues. The matter continues to stir debate about the role of justices and their impact on political proceedings, setting a scene for further scrutiny of the judicial branch's influence on electoral processes.
